The larger scale. And its roots in the texts of Lenin. For others such as Isaac Deutscher whose theses were later developed by Moshe Lewin Lenin would have warned towards the end of his life that the dictatorial State showed an irreversible tendency to crystallize into an organism with its own laws and interests and ran the risk of suffer serious distortions in relation to the initial objectives thus escaping the hands of its founders and contradicting the hopes of the masses. The instrument was becoming an end in itself.
Lenin would have glimpsed that a coercive system instituted to promote freedom can instead of ensuring social forces outside Japan Telegram Number Data state apparatus a growing participation in power become a new machine of oppression.. These authors strive to present us with a tragic Lenin in the last years of his life increasingly powerless to fill the unbridgeable gap between theory and practice between intentions and results but at the same time desperate to overcome his illness and seek alliances. policies capable of confronting a bureaucracy that does not hesitate to call by its own name long before Leon Trotsky developed his theory of bureaucracyfifteen.
For a critique of the Leninist theory of power Leninist theory has not ceased to be present in political debates throughout the more than years that separate us from the appearance of The State and the Revolution . Like any controversial text it has known apologists and detractors. Although it is beyond the limits of this essay to draw a complete picture of its reception it is worth rethinking some deeply debated themes in Leninist theory of politics power and the State his instrumental conception of power its tendency to conceive the State only in its repressive dimension his conception of social simplification and the end of politics under the postcapitalist order his notions about the neutrality of technique and finally the lack of articulation.
| 
发表于 2024-3-12 13:06:36