|
|
Requested broad access to the messages, a request that was orally denied by the first instance judge. Questioned by the STF, the judge stated that she "thought it would be appropriate to continue the aforementioned hearing as normal, due to the clear harm to the accused who are in prison." According to Fachin, the first degree act contradicts the STF's understanding in Binding Precedent 14. "It is not up to the judicial authority or the Public Prosecutor's Office to select which of the evidence collected, incorporated into the records referring to the facts subject to investigation, are or are not useful for the development of the defensive strategy in the processing of criminal proceedings", stated the minister. "The STF's decision comes at a good time, reestablishes the natural order of things and signals that vices and authoritarian and illegal practices need to be eradicated once and for all from the forensic routine, even through investigation by correctional bodies, such as the CNJ",
He said in a statement criminalist Eduardo Samoel Fonseca.The Federal Public Ministry of Paraná presented a request to annul the testimony in which lawyer Rodrigo Tacla Duran accused the former judge and current senator Sergio Moro (União Brasil) and the former prosecutor and current federal deputy Deltan Dallagnol (Podemos) of asking for money so that he wouldn't be arrested at the height of the late "lava Jato". reprod Special Phone Number Data uction Rodrigo Tacla Duran gave testimony last Monday (27/3) Reproduction The MPF's request was signed by Public Prosecutor Walter José Mathias Júnior, who accompanied the testimony given last Monday (27/3) to judge Eduardo Appio, of the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba. In the text, the prosecutor maintains that there was an omission by Appio, since at the end of the testimony the MPF expressly requested the secrecy of the act, since facts were being brought about parliamentarians with forum prerogative.
The prosecutor also claims that, with the decision of Minister Ricardo Lewandowski, of the Federal Supreme Court, to order the suspension of criminal proceedings against Tacla Duran, the testimony would become null and void. The MPF-PR argues that the testimony would serve to adjust the precautionary measures that would replace the preventive detention against Tacla Duran, which had been revoked. "However, given the floor to the defendant, who is advocating his own cause, the solemnity served to — in the name of broad defense — criticize the work carried out by the Task Force and Magistrates that preceded the work before this Court and elaborate on supposed evidence that would be it has been in its power for years, and there is no urgency to overcome the suspension." The MPF from Paraná asks for explanations about the questions presented by the lawyer and for the court of the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba to reconsider the request for secrecy.
|
|
发表于 2024-2-19 14:58:00